Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bill Madonna's avatar

Democrats have recently enjoyed pitching electoral college reform when it suits them, even going so far as to rally faithless electors in 2016. Why is asking electors to break their oaths to voters, and in the case of 33 states asking electors to actually break the law, any less shameful than what election deniers attempted in 2020? Keep in mind I didn’t ask how are they different... I understand faithless vs alternate electors are two different animals. I’m knowingly using whataboutism to ask: Why is it any less shameful for one party to attempt to alter the results of the election than the other? Not a Trump supporter, by the way.

Expand full comment
Marc Slavin's avatar

Hal this is a little far-fetched don't you think?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts