3 Comments

Democrats have recently enjoyed pitching electoral college reform when it suits them, even going so far as to rally faithless electors in 2016. Why is asking electors to break their oaths to voters, and in the case of 33 states asking electors to actually break the law, any less shameful than what election deniers attempted in 2020? Keep in mind I didn’t ask how are they different... I understand faithless vs alternate electors are two different animals. I’m knowingly using whataboutism to ask: Why is it any less shameful for one party to attempt to alter the results of the election than the other? Not a Trump supporter, by the way.

Expand full comment

Hal this is a little far-fetched don't you think?

Expand full comment

I appreciate the detail description of Johnson's actions post the 2020 election. While politics may prevent such happening, I would like to see him interviewed on the subject with all the facts in hand as to what happened and when. Clearly, we cannot stand another administration with Trump at the helm when you consider his behavior since 2020. I'm a strong supporter of No Labels and its 'insurance policy' - if needed.

Expand full comment